For which patient is 'no treatment at the emergency visit' explicitly listed as an acceptable management option?
OMS questions focus on surgical decision-making with medical comorbidities that change the surgical plan. This exam-level vignette tests your ability to work through clinical details and arrive at the correct management.
Two children present with complicated crown fractures (pulp exposure). Patient A is a 10-year-old boy with a fractured permanent upper central incisor (tooth 11, open apex). Patient B is a 3-year-old girl with a fractured primary upper central incisor (tooth 51). Both children are distressed. A paediatric dental team is available for referral within 2 days. For which patient is 'no treatment at the emergency visit' explicitly listed as an acceptable management option?
- A. Neither patient — pulp exposure always requires immediate treatment
- B. Patient A (permanent tooth) only — immature permanent teeth can safely wait for specialist treatment
- C. Both patients — emergency deferral is acceptable for any complicated crown fracture
- D. Patient B (primary tooth) only — no treatment is acceptable at the emergency visit when rapid referral to a child-oriented team is available
The only ADC prep platform where every answer is traced to the guideline source.
No invented explanations. No guesswork content. Every question mapped to Therapeutic Guidelines, Odell's, IADT, and more — so you study what the exam actually tests.
Score high, pay less.
Make your next practice session count. Explore five selected chapters in a 48-hour trial, with an opportunity to earn up to 25% off through the trial challenge. Qualifying steps and deadlines apply.
Try Reviz on WhatsApp.
Explore selected chapters in a 48-hour trial. Account setup is required; continued access needs a paid plan.
Show the answer and cited explanation
This captures the fundamentally different emergency management philosophy between primary and permanent teeth: Permanent teeth: treat at the emergency visit. Partial pulpotomy is recommended for both immature and mature teeth. Primary teeth: 'no treatment may be the most appropriate option in the emergency situation, but only when there is the potential for rapid referral (within several days) to the child-oriented team.' The reasoning: each treatment option for primary teeth is invasive and has the potential to cause long-term dental anxiety. A TDI is often the child's first dental encounter. Minimising the trauma of the dental visit itself is a legitimate clinical priority. SOURCE — IADT Guidelines 2020, Fractures and Luxations Table 4; Primary Dentition Table 3
Exam preparation FAQ
Every answer, traced to the source.
Remy — the AI tutor inside Reviz — drills you on 7,000+ ADC-style cited questions with spaced repetition, on WhatsApp and the web.
Explore the Reviz trial